Marines in ww2 pacific reddit. Hollywood loves to be dramatic, so two part question.

Marines in ww2 pacific reddit. As the Pacific was very much the "Navy's War", the Navy were keen to keep as many of their resources in the Pacific as possible, including their marines. On Guadalcanal, at least, the Marines started to come to this realization about the enemy's view of surrender within five days. . Truly, how bad was it for your typical marine rifleman in the pacific theater? I've seen plenty of movies but not many documentaries or books about the pacific theater. How valuable really were saltines for US soldiers in WWII? The Marine Corps had six. The island and amphibious based warfare of the Pacific meant that the Marines, with their amphibious training were far more useful than the regular Army. In particular, they take a crate of saltine crackers and seem especially excited to have found them, and it is later traded for several cans of peaches. S. That was the main differences between the Marines and the regular Army in the Pacific. The popular image of Marines in WWII is one of infantry charging ashore. In fact, twenty specialized Marine Defense Battalions were supposed to defend against Japanese amphibious invasions and and air attacks. As you say, there were a number of Army units serving in the Pacific- because there weren't enough Marines to cover the entire theater of operations. What was the Difference between the US army and the Marines in the pacific theater of WW2? Both fought in the Pacific but what were the differences? Was one used to establish a secure beachfront and then the other take the rest of the Island? From my understanding of the Pacific War, the Japanese were at their best against American forces when they were in entrenched defences, but in any other situation they always seemed to do rather poorly. More US Army Soldiers were fighting in the Central Pacific, South Pacific, and China-Burma-India theaters than Marines. Apart from doctirne/capabilities, The Marines were part of the US Navy and could be weilded/deployed as such. In a scene in the show The Pacific, several US marines steal supplies from the army. Hollywood loves to be dramatic, so two part question. Anywhere the US had boots on the ground as it were, the Army was the largest share of them. We think of the U. Marines as spearheading the pacific campaign, but I had heard that the Army dedicated 25% of their forces to the pacific and 75% to the European theater. From the first real major sustained combat engagement that the Marines performed: Guadalcanal. Were marines mostly enlistees? It's mostly secondary sources, but "Midnight in the Pacific" and "Neptune's Inferno" are great books about the Guadalcanal campaign. At surface level this doesn't make much sense, by the time the US got into the war Japan had been fighting in China for years while the US had to - as was tradition - build a whole new army Why did the Pacific land battles of WWII often have such lopsided casualty numbers? Was it more to do with Japanese vs Allied ground tactics, differences in materiel logistics, or general strategy? Also, were Japanese officials aware of this imbalance and how (if at all) did they try to change? Recently watched The Pacific and in one scene Snafu says “What kind of a marine gets fucking drafted?” and I wondered what exactly that meant and why. Midnight in the Pacific mentions that more sailors were killed than marines or soldiers during the campaign. The other one I had learned a long time ago is that there were more casualties in the ETO than the PTO. But Marines weren't just expected to take islands. cidtj shhvpxv fjx onmybao ehoxbx edw ijikx ufklcdp ojxjqj sapp

I Understand
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the very best experience. By clicking 'I Understand', you consent to 'allow all cookies'. If you want, you can change your settings at any time by visiting our cookies page.More About Cookies